Google Translate: the + date 1667 double occupied, because divergent references to the Filiation do…
Shared note |
Google Translate: the + date 1667 double occupied, because divergent references to the Filiation do not allow the probably identical persons Bartholome (* before 1638) u. Barthlin (* before 1610) to unify WINZER, especially since after Bartholome s + date 1667 also the 2.oo1669 of the Wwe Chrischona RÖMELIN could confirm this + date, but also the Wwe of the Barthlin according to KRech for 1668 and 1669 As Bartlin WIN [T] ZER (not more WIN [T] ZERLIN like his father) he pays according to KR ech 1652-62 zus.m. other censites "because of Mr. CLEMen sel. Stifftung" (= Rev. Joh KLEMM, see also Andreas GRAF and Jakob WINZER); Interest "8 Jar at Friz ENGEL". Is described as a carrier: The KRech 1652 to 1663-64 leave rearrangement of a hith erto vivly led by Fronmüller Fritz HAT Tragerei now with Hans u. Jacob Bachtaler, add. Hans R [UP], Fritz ENGEL, Marx GÜTLIN u. Jacob WENKH [Riehen] at the bearer Bartlin WINZER recognize by several changes of interest points. Lt. KRech 1668 u. I n 1669, Barthlins Wwe. "Gave" [interest], which confirms the date. - A separation father - son? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long term of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as w ell as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 1688-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question father - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reorganization of the FN in cas e of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene. what the + confirmed date.- A separation father - son? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long ter m of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as well as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 1688-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question fathe r - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reshaping the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene. what the + confirmed date.- A separation father - s on? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long term of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as well as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 16 88-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question father - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reshaping the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censi t u. Neighbors gene. Berain 1649, the question father - son is inextricably interwoven, especially as by reshuffling the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene . Berain 1649, the question father - son is inextricably interwoven, especially as by reshuffling the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene |
Sources
Title |
Abbreviation |
Author |
Publication |
Individuals |
Families |
Media objects |
Shared notes |
Last change |
Repositories
Repository name |
Sources |
Last change |
Submitters
Submitter name |
Individuals |
Families |
Last change |