Google Translate: the + date 1667 double occupied, because divergent references to the Filiation do…

Shared note

Google Translate: the + date 1667 double occupied, because divergent references to the Filiation do not allow the probably identical persons Bartholome (* before 1638) u. Barthlin (* before 1610) to unify WINZER, especially since after Bartholome s + date 1667 also the 2.oo1669 of the Wwe Chrischona RÖMELIN could confirm this + date, but also the Wwe of the Barthlin according to KRech for 1668 and 1669 As Bartlin WIN [T] ZER (not more WIN [T] ZERLIN like his father) he pays according to KR ech 1652-62 zus.m. other censites "because of Mr. CLEMen sel. Stifftung" (= Rev. Joh KLEMM, see also Andreas GRAF and Jakob WINZER); Interest "8 Jar at Friz ENGEL". Is described as a carrier: The KRech 1652 to 1663-64 leave rearrangement of a hith erto vivly led by Fronmüller Fritz HAT Tragerei now with Hans u. Jacob Bachtaler, add. Hans R [UP], Fritz ENGEL, Marx GÜTLIN u. Jacob WENKH [Riehen] at the bearer Bartlin WINZER recognize by several changes of interest points. Lt. KRech 1668 u. I n 1669, Barthlins Wwe. "Gave" [interest], which confirms the date. - A separation father - son? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long term of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as w ell as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 1688-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question father - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reorganization of the FN in cas e of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene. what the + confirmed date.- A separation father - son? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long ter m of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as well as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 1688-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question fathe r - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reshaping the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene. what the + confirmed date.- A separation father - s on? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long term of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as well as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 16 88-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question father - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reshaping the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censi t u. Neighbors gene. Berain 1649, the question father - son is inextricably interwoven, especially as by reshuffling the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene . Berain 1649, the question father - son is inextricably interwoven, especially as by reshuffling the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene

Given names Surname Sosa Birth Place Death Age Place Last change
about 1600
424 0 356 67 Never
Given names Surname Age Given names Surname Age Marriage Place Last change
Media objects
Media Title Individuals Families Sources Last change
Sources
Title Abbreviation Author Publication Individuals Families Media objects Shared notes Last change
Repositories
Repository name Sources Last change
Submitters
Submitter name Individuals Families Last change