Barthlin Winzer, 1600–1667?> (aged 67 years)
- Name
- Barthlin /Winzer/
Birth
|
|
---|---|
Death of a father
|
|
Death
|
|
father |
1570–1649
Birth: about 1570 Death: about 1649 — Stetten, Lorrach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany |
---|---|
elder brother |
1591–1671
Birth: about 1591 — Stetten, Lorrach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Death: August 8, 1671 — Stetten, Lorrach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany |
10 years
himself |
1600–1667
Birth: about 1600 — Stetten, Lorrach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Death: July 12, 1667 — Stetten, Lorrach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany |
Shared note
|
Google Translate: the + date 1667 double occupied, because divergent references to the Filiation do not allow the probably identical persons Bartholome (* before 1638) u. Barthlin (* before 1610) to unify WINZER, especially since after Bartholome s + date 1667 also the 2.oo1669 of the Wwe Chrischona RÖMELIN could confirm this + date, but also the Wwe of the Barthlin according to KRech for 1668 and 1669 As Bartlin WIN [T] ZER (not more WIN [T] ZERLIN like his father) he pays according to KR ech 1652-62 zus.m. other censites "because of Mr. CLEMen sel. Stifftung" (= Rev. Joh KLEMM, see also Andreas GRAF and Jakob WINZER); Interest "8 Jar at Friz ENGEL". Is described as a carrier: The KRech 1652 to 1663-64 leave rearrangement of a hith erto vivly led by Fronmüller Fritz HAT Tragerei now with Hans u. Jacob Bachtaler, add. Hans R [UP], Fritz ENGEL, Marx GÜTLIN u. Jacob WENKH [Riehen] at the bearer Bartlin WINZER recognize by several changes of interest points. Lt. KRech 1668 u. I n 1669, Barthlins Wwe. "Gave" [interest], which confirms the date. - A separation father - son? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long term of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as w ell as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 1688-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question father - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reorganization of the FN in cas e of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene. what the + confirmed date.- A separation father - son? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long ter m of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as well as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 1688-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question fathe r - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reshaping the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene. what the + confirmed date.- A separation father - s on? with the KRech not possible, Filiation suspected because of long term of the interest posts. Until Krech 1683-87 interest points run on this name, as well as for 100 lb Hauptguet (mainly Vorgen Foundation), which have been replaced at KRech 16 88-95 - Also in information according to Berain 1649, the question father - son unsolvable interwoven, especially since by reshaping the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing.- Lt. Berain 1649 extensively as Censi t u. Neighbors gene. Berain 1649, the question father - son is inextricably interwoven, especially as by reshuffling the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene . Berain 1649, the question father - son is inextricably interwoven, especially as by reshuffling the FN in case of loss of the suffix -LIN everything is even more confusing. Berain 1649 extensively as Censit u. Neighbors gene |
---|